I am at that age where my Facebook feed constantly offers up
pictures of engagement rings, weddings, and lots of babies. Lots and lots of
babies.
While some of my fellow single ladies find this to be a tad
annoying, I don’t mind so much. It’s nice to see good things happening for good
people when they’re ready for said good things to happen. Even if those things
are kind of red and wrinkly and a little gross looking. With weird heads.
When you look at pregnancy patterns across Mammalia, you see
a wide variety of systems. Rats have a gestational period of just over two
weeks, while elephants can take 2 years to develop in utero.
Humans take, on average, 40 weeks to develop before birth.
It’s long been thought that this timeline is determined by female pelvis size.
Basically, that babies pop out right before their heads grow too big to fit
through the birth canal.
Long ago in our evolutionary history, before we stood on two
legs, we were quadrapedal rodents running around birthing multiple babies at
once. But as the millennia passed and we rose to walk on just two feet, our
pelvises had to evolve to support an upright posture. It narrowed so as to
balance our distribution of weight. The tradeoff here was females no longer
being able to (comfortably) give birth to multiple, or more developed and
not-so-helpless offspring.
This interpretation was long held, and even suggested that
gestation had to shorten in duration especially for the human lineage as
intelligence evolved. With bigger brains came bigger heads, making birth
essential earlier in the pregnancy timeline. This too would be a tradeoff- a
newborn with only a small percent of its brain development completed makes for
a very helpless little nugget of neediness.
New findings suggest that evolving a wider pelvis would not
be disadvantageous to females. Walking and running is not compromised, and only
3 extra centimeters would be needed to produce babies with 40% brain
development at birth (which is more than we currently average). Though it
sounds scary, an extra 3 centimeters is statistically not that far-fetched. Evolutionarily,
it’s actually pretty doable.
So why end the pregnancy party so early? Why not let it bake
for a little longer, ensuring a more precocial offspring?
Scientists recently took a different approach to
understanding gestation length in humans. They compared body size to gestation
length in different species of primates. Homo sapiens actually break the mold,
gestating longer than primate
patterns would predict. That’s quite different than the suggestion of the
previous model: that human gestation was shortened to accommodate babies with
bigger brains. So females are pushing
our bodies to the limits—but if not pelvis width, what are those gestational
limits?
Evidence suggests those limits are metabolic. Our bodies are
capable of supporting spurts of metabolic activity about 2 times that of
resting metabolism. By the third trimester, a woman’s metabolism is already
running at twice its normal rate. Those last few months are extremely taxing on
a woman’s body. By 40 weeks, the baby is requiring nutrients and energy at a
rate that a woman simply cannot satisfy past 40 weeks or so.
The article posted on livescience.com ends on a thoughtful
note- suggesting that maybe helpless offspring aren’t so bad after all. And
that makes sense; a brain that comes into this world with more than 60% growing
capacity has room for learning through experience. There are some advantageous survival
behaviors that simply cannot be programmed into your brain at birth- like the
fundamentals of cellular biology that help you understand the need to clean and
disinfect a cut. Or how to grow crops and feed yourself and your family. Or how
to use tools that build homes and provide shelter. Our blank baby brains are
part of what makes us arguably the most successful species on earth. They give
us the capacity to learn.
How amazing it is that all of these factors are tied
together- the evolution of bipedal locomotion, to brain size, to pelvis width,
to the capacity for in utero brain development, to the evolution of higher
intelligence and consequently the ability to feel emotion. Perhaps the most
beautiful factor in the evolutionary story of our brains is the ability to
appreciate warm fuzzy things that seemingly have no bearing on us or our chances
for survival. Like cozy, happy feelings you get from Christmas time, or a
bouquet of flowers from someone who loves you, or even warm fuzzies from
Facebook photos of friends holding their perfectly ripened, 40-week old bundles
of helplessness.
Here’s a link to the original article, written by Stephanie
Pappas of Livescience.com. She writes good stuff- read more of it.
http://www.livescience.com/22715-pregnancy-length-baby-size.html
Wait... so evolution-ally speaking... we were rodents? Interesting, so did they find that women with naturally higher metabolism had longer pregnancies?
ReplyDelete